Not affiliated with The United States Office of Personnel Management or any government agency

May 6, 2024

Federal Employee Retirement and Benefits News

Category: Articles

Articles

All the latest articles covering the information that you will be craving to devour will be available via this category. From getting to know how indebted our company is to reading about the presidential elections; from knowing about new retirement plans to finding out how security breaches can affect your life; you can browse it all!

For more articles, visit our articles’ section.

Public Sector Retirement, LLC (‘PSR,’ ‘PSRetirement.com’ or the ‘Site’) is a news channel focusing on federal and postal retirement information.  Although PSR publishes information believed to be accurate and from authors that have proclaimed themselves as experts in their given field of endeavor but PSR cannot guarantee the accuracy of any such information not can PSR independently verify such professional claims for accuracy.  Expressly, PSR disclaims any liability for any inaccuracies written by authors on the Site, makes no claims to the validity of such information.  By reading any information provided by June Kirby or other Authors you acknowledge that you have read and agree to be bound by the Terms of Use

Don’t Just Rely On Social Security To Help You During Retirement

Anybody who wants to live comfortably during retirement – that doesn’t involve working part-time – should not rely on just Social Security income. This advice comes directly from the Social Security Administration.

According to the SSA, only a minute amount of pre-retirement earnings will be replaced, and most people need about 70 percent of their pre-retirement income to be able to live well in retirement. This income includes investments, savings and Social Security benefits. Therefore, a stable retirement plan must be supplemented income that isn’t just Social Security.

What Are Some Additional Sources of Income You Should Consider?

Federal employees are rather lucky because their benefits include an array of retirement income sources. Social Security is considered a part of the income sources but only a minute amount. What are some other income sources federal employees need to consider?

Federal Employees Retirement System

The FERS offers benefits from three source – Thrift Savings Plan, general benefit plan and Social Security. Two parts of the FERS include the TSP and Social Security moves with you if you decide to transfer to another federal job before you retire.

General Benefit

With FERS, you must pay your fair share every pay period. The agency takes out a general benefit and Social Security from your paycheck, noting it as payroll deductions. The agency pays its dues as well. After retirement, you get annuity payments every month. How much you receive is dependent on how long you worked with the Federal Government, the age you decide to retire and the amount you earn.

Thrift Savings Plan

The TSP is considered a distinct contribution plan, which means the income you receive in retirement from the TSP account depends on the amount you and the agency put into it while you worked and the amount you accumulated during that time.

The TSP of FERS is something the agency sets up right away. With each pay period, the agency puts one percent of basic pay into the account. While you can contribute to the TSP account yourself, the agency will deposit a matching contribution.

How Your TSP Account Can Help You Become A Millionaire

The TSP is a somewhat significant retirement income source. Therefore, making regular contributions to it during your career while completely taking advantage of the matching part from the government could lead to considerable wealth. Of course, that means making sure the money is invested well in the first place.

A good number of federal employees earn more than $1 million from their TSP accounts – just by investing and saving wisely even when the market doesn’t do well. It’s not that hard to become a millionaire when you invest wisely in the TSP.

Federal employees can also contribute to an IRA away from the TSP, which lets them invest even more of their money and increase it in a tax-deferred or tax-free account.

Civil Service Retirement System

When it comes to Social Security under the CSRS, it’s treated in another way for federal workers.

How Viable Is Social Security?

Government reports suggest that the Social Security program is rather unstable, making it an unstable option for retirement. With that in mind, people must do their due diligence and save money on their own for retirement.

According to the 2017 Social Security Trustees report, the program’s reserves are slated to be drained in 2034. A poll shows that 80 percent of millennials are concerned they will not have any Social Security when they are ready to retire because of the financial instability facing the program today.

Will the Social Security income still be viable? And, if so, for how long will it stay that way? The SSA is trying to get people to understand that the payments they receive is not meant to replace the retirement income but supplement it. People are urged to invest and save as much as they can to enjoy their golden years.

An Uncertain Path To Retirement

Planning for your retirement is a daunting task for most of us, even for federal employees. Various interrelated factors may complicate this process. Nowadays, conventional retirement plans either have disappeared, or existing ones (like FERS) are becoming less adequate. On top of that, Social Security seems like it won’t last forever. Increase in the lifespans of individuals results in retirees outliving their savings or retirement plans.

 

Luckily, with good preparation, you can enjoy a successful retirement. With assistance from retirement planners, you can create an effective retirement plan no matter your age group. To do so, you need to understand your current financial situation to prepare for a future in retirement.

 

In the Twenties: Typically, we attain financial independence in our twenties. At this stage in our lives, we seldom think of planning for retirement. But nurturing the right skills is essential now and in the future. This is why it is important that you evaluate all available options regarding your retirement. Accordingly, taking life insurance is not necessary as you have no dependents. Doing so will minimize your ability to build a savings scheme. On the other hand, avoid depending on employer saving plans as they have little chance of maximizing your savings. Often, most employers have retirement plans that exceed conventional incentive programs. Those lacking a retirement plan with their employer should open up an Individual Retirement Plan (IRA) to accumulate retirement savings.

 

Finally, consider obtaining a credit card, a car loan, or paying off your debts on a monthly basis. Though you might hesitate to accumulate debt, lacking access to credit complicates your ability to handle and manage complex financial engagements.

 

In the Thirties: this age group enjoys increased earning power with increasing advancements in their career. As a result, you should increase your retirement contributions to benefit from compounded interest rates. Also, you should open up an IRA account to leverage new employment opportunities as well as to consolidate any of your accumulated savings from previous jobs.

Employed heads of families need to make savings in preparation for their children’s college education. Putting your kids through college is a demanding undertaking that requires an effective savings plan. You can create one through the assistance of an experienced financial advisor. Besides that, it is a drain on your capacity to make adequate retirement contributions. As your stash of savings increases, consider creating a will and an estate plan for your dependents. Those who are self-employed should create a succession plan to ensure the continuity of their business after retiring.

 

In the Forties: with your children making decisions about their futures, you will need to create a plan for covering their educational expenses. Find out more about scholarships and grants to reduce financial strain. Given that, you should identify options that require no repayment.

 

Consulting with your financial advisor is a good way of ensuring that you achieve this objective. Financial advisors can help you formulate a retirement plan that keeps all your goals in sight. In this regard, you should ponder what kind of retirement you want in the future.

 

In the Fifties: this is the right time to think about your retirement plan deeply. Evaluate all your options regarding how you want to exit the workplace. Based on your predetermined timeline, consider stepping up your investment contributions or take advantage of provisions that let you exceed typical contribution premiums.

 

In the Sixties: during this period you can access your retirement savings without incurring penalties. Therefore, continue increasing your contributions as well as exploring distribution options in view of your current revenue flows, taxes, and your ability to sustain a retirement plan.

 

Also, you should ponder the implications of any health care needs you might have in the long term. As a result, you should aim at purchasing insurance that will offset any potential health complications in the future. Assess your income sources to determine the appropriate time to sign up for Social security. Keep it in mind that Social Security benefits decrease based on when you join.

 

Plus, you ought to involve your children and spouse in your wealth transfer plan. Provide insights and advice regarding how to protect your hard-earned wealth or property.

 

In the seventies and beyond: by this time, you are in retirement. Nonetheless, you need a plan for taking out Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs) from your investment. For this, you need to work closely with your financial advisor in matching your lifestyle to your assets. Doing so will let you relax and enjoy life while remaining focused on the most important undertakings as well as creating a fitting legacy.

 

Your road to retirement is long and uncertain. For this reason, you need to identify a trustworthy and dependable financial advisor to help you along the way. On top of that, it pays to include your family in any decisions you make as you craft a retirement plan.

 

Top 5 Retirement Questions

Ideally, it is important that you create a written statement of your retirement plan. Your retirement plan should be simple rather than complex or verbose. According to surveys, having a written plan contributes to feelings of satisfaction in the long term. But why is that so? Often you will have to evaluate various interlinked factors to identify your expectations and needs. This is why the importance of developing a plan cannot be overstated. Through this plan, you get to grips with what your retirement entails. In this post are tips to help you answer the most important of retirement questions.

How Long Is Your Retirement?

To answer this question, you need to figure out how long you expect to live after retirement. Typically, a majority of people get the answer wrong. The number of years you expect to be in retirement determine the type of plan you can create. Underestimating the impact of average life expectancy can expose you to financial difficulties over the retirement years. Research more on expected life expectancy for your age group to help you overcome this challenge. Also, doing so will help you get a personalized estimate of your life expectancy.

For couples, it is important considering the question, how long do you expect to continue cohabiting? The demise of your spouse will alter your retirement dynamics such as expenses and income streams. Therefore, your retirement plan should factor these contingencies.

How Ready are You For Retirement?

Despite being a nonfinancial question, the answer determines your satisfaction level in retirement. Remember that age shouldn’t determine your retirement date. Being ready for retirement is a psychological condition. It implies that you are comfortable leaving behind your workplace responsibilities. And that you can effectively focus on other events and activities. Answering the following question will help you determine if you are ready to retire.

What do you plan to accomplish in retirement?

Getting an answer to this question will determine how much you will spend. Avoid over-relying on guidelines or instinct. Instead, you should create a spending estimate that suits your needs, activities, and interests. Hence, you must evaluate what standards of living you want during your retirement keeping in mind that expenses will vary annually.

Apparently, during retirement people tend to spend less as they grow older after taking care of their most important expenses. Many over 75-year-olds decrease their spending habits though this might increase due to long-term medical and healthcare needs. It is necessary, therefore, that your estimate considers the impact of inflation as living costs increase over time.

When will you be ready to retire?

Being ready for retirement requires that you have assets and income that can help you sustain an appropriate standard of living. To do so, assess your projected spending habits against your retirement revenue streams. Where necessary, make changes to align your lifestyle with your income and assets. Ensuring that you have a guaranteed revenue stream will enhance the quality of life you enjoy after retiring.

Most people have the resources necessary to cover their retirement expenses. In turn, this minimizes the amount of stress and strain you will experience once you retire. There are a few things that you can do to help you achieve a financially secure retirement. To begin with, don’t hesitate to sign up for Social Security especially if you are married. Besides that, it is important that you create an alternative source of income. You can do so through deferred income annuity or an immediate annuity. Other options include purchasing maximized medical insurance or using a mix of personal assets and insurance to help you manage long-term medical needs.

Finally, how will you invest and manage your assets?

To successfully manage your assets you need an investment strategy. Spending 7% of your retirement funds can deplete your savings fast despite contrary opinions. In contrast, financial planners recommend that you should spend approximately 4% or less. This is why establishing a spending policy is important to match your expenses with your retirement expectations.

In conclusion, retirement planning entails more than what has been discussed above. However, when planning for retirement, you should come up with answers to the above questions. Doing so will guarantee you a successful retirement.

 

 

 

 

Safeguard Your Retirement with the Right Investments

Typically, investors receive the same admonishment any time markets perform poorly: don’t abandon ship! You should take this advice with a pinch of salt. Properly, investing your resources depends on your age and financial goals.

 

In the light of recent market turbulence, now is the right time to think about your investments. Why is it important to do so? Stocks have had a rocky second quarter. In the past week, news about new tariffs and technology sector distresses have affected the stability of the Dow. Early last week, Empower Retirement, a company that processes over $530 billion of retirement assets, had a10% increase in the volume of calling it receives. Likewise, Fidelity Investments, with a portfolio of 15 million retirement plans also experienced the same during February. But what does that portend? It means that investors are looking for assurance that their investments are safe. This is why it is important that you evaluate the soundness of your investment decision. Use the following point to help you do so.

 

Assess you Asset Allocation

 

Consider the amount of money you have invested in your retirement plan. Make sure that you allocate 70% of funds to equity and 30% to bonds. A retirement plan with over 70% in stocks is typically considered aggressive. And a plan with less than 70% being highly susceptible to market variations.

 

You should determine your ideal fund distribution based on when you are going to retire. If you are about to retire, you shouldn’t take on more risk. But if you are a long way from retirement, you shouldn’t be concerned about market fluctuations. Use online tools available from your 401(k) plan provider or third-party providers to assess your retirement scheme.

 

Consider Target Date Funds

 

These are funds that let you select your investment instrument based on your retirement date. With this instrument, investment decisions are made by fund managers with gradual adjustment over time. Target date funds are safer as they rely on investment professionals for making investment decisions. As a result, this protects you from making investment decisions based on emotions.

 

Even so, be cautious when picking a retirement date and its associated target fund. Target date funds assume that you will retire at the age of 65. Nowadays, most investors only claim Social Security when they are 67 or 68 years of age. As a result, you might consider vintage funds as your investment vehicle as it gives you more time for claiming Social Security.  For those in a 2050 fund, they might consider moving the retirement date to 2055.

 

Monitor Your Investment Portfolio

 

Avoid combining a 401(k) and a target date fund in your portfolio as this is most risky as well as impacting your retirement plan. You can avoid this by being extremely watchful of your investment; it nonetheless limits your investment options. Maintaining this level of control on your investment requires personal supervision instead of professional supervision.

 

Though you can build an investment on your own, it is hazardous doing so. Why? As you will incur unnecessary fees and overlapping investment options that can burn your investment plan. If this sounds intimidating, then a target date fund is your best option.

 

Remain Vigilant

 

A common investment mistake is a failure to rebalance your portfolio. Let’s say you let a 60% stock allocation increase to 75%. In the event of a recession, your investment will most likely suffer substantially. What can you do to prevent this? Reallocate any growth from stocks into other investment instruments. Annually, rebalance your portfolio. Use your birthday or any other key anniversary to help you remember.

 

Portfolio rebalancing is most important if you are nearing your retirement date. But this time you should do it on a quarterly basis. Combine rebalancing, dollar averaging, or fixed interest investments to ensure you attain long-term success.

 

Maximizing the Sweet Spot Years of Your Retirement

 

As you approach your retirement, it is high time you address your tax obligations. Retirement’s sweet spot is the period between formal retirement and when you begin accessing RMDs from your 401(k) plan or your individual retirement plan. Typically, this is around the age of 70.5 years.

Since you no longer have any full-time commitments, you are now in a lower tax bracket. Subsequently, this is the right time to benefit from low tax rates. Even so, you need to ensure that your overall retirement goals are in line with your retirement goals. Caveat! You shouldn’t focus on reducing the amount of taxes you pay instead, you should concentrate on accomplishing your retirement goals. So read on to find out more about how to leverage reduced tax rates.  Here are a few suggestions you can capitalize on low tax returns.

 

# 1: Embrace Roth

 

Convert your presentIRA or 401(k) retirement plan into a Roth IRA. Though you must pay taxes on the conversion amount, it is at a much lower rate. On the other hand, retainingyour funds in a traditional IRA or a 401(k) plan without taking out any RMDs leads to higher taxes.

 

Roth IRA withdrawals typically charge no taxes. Plus, no RMDs requirements apply to them. Actually, you can pass accumulated Roth IRA funds and tax-freestatus to your heirs.  Besides that, you can stretch a Roth IRA over several years to minimize the impact of taxes as well speed up switch over to a higher tax bracketanytime you want. But before initiating a conversion, you need to consider the following factors.

 

To begin with, ensure that you have sufficient cash resources for settling your due taxes. Beware that 2018 tax rules allow for no conversion reversals ever. This means that your assets are permanently locked in a Roth IRA. Besides, you must abstain from tapping into a Roth IRA’s assets for five years after conversion.

 

Offload Valuable Assets

 

You might have stock or assets held in a taxable account. If so, consider offloading your long-term high-value assets when your tax obligations are still minimal. Doing so lets you benefit from any appreciated gains.  Why is this so? Because any long-term gains on capital are adjusted relative to your gross income (see the table below).

 

Tax Rate Single Taxpayer Married Filing Jointly Head of Household
0% Below $38,600 Below $77,200 Below $51,700
15% $38,600-$425,800 $77,200-$479,00 $51,700-$452,400
20% Over $425,800 Over $479,000 Over $452,400

 

Selling any appreciated assets when your income is below the 0% threshold attracts tax at a rate between 15% and 20%. Also, if you are married with gross revenues of $250,000, a 3.8% tax is imposed on any other income you earn.

 

Leverage Employee Stock Options

Take advantage of low tax rates with employee stock options in your retirement twilight years. Doing so when your stock’s value is high and prices are low will increase your gains. Plus, use low tax years to offload most of your employee stocks.

 

Get Rid of Saving Bonds

Today, US saving bonds aren’t a viable means of long-term asset growth because of low interest. This is why many retirees hold on to bonds issued during high-interest rate periods. Offloading these bonds means you only pay ordinary income tax on any accumulated interest. So selling off these assets is a great financial coup.

Top 4 Tips For Evaluating Life Insurance

Life insurance replaces your income in case of an early demise. It provides protection to a spouse, children, or other dependents. Often it is challenging determining how much life insurance is sufficient for your unique needs. Here are four tips to help you overcome this challenge:

 

Tip #1: Forecast Your Critical Needs

 

You can do so by reflecting on the following questions: Are your kids currently attending college or will they do so in the future?  If you answer yes, you need to assess how much that is likely to cost as well as create a payment plan.

 

Tip # 2: Alternative Income Stream

 

Though specific circumstances vary, identifying a source of alternative income is important. Typically, families find it necessary replacing 60% of its gross revenue. For example, replacing$75,000 requires an income stream of $45,000 per year.

 

Tip # 3: Leverage Shortfalls

 

Assume that your dependents require $45,000 to replace your income. With returns pegged at 5%, your life insurance plan amounts to $900,000 after 20 years. Even so, this figure doesn’t include college or medical expenses.

 

Tip # 4: Evaluate Your Current Assets

 

Knowing your dependents needs helps in assessing your current savings plan. Let’s say their needs amount to $1 million and you presently have $350,000 in assets, you need to raise $650,000 through savings.

 

Top 3 Retiree Financial Planning Options

As you approach your retirement, it is vital that you have access to high quality financial successfully transition your lifestyle. To illustrate the importance of doing so, let’s consider a hypothetical case. Assume you are a 65-year-old couple due to retire in the next one year. You have stashed over $1 million in 401(k), taxable, and retirement investment funds. Currently, you have invested your savings in different instruments to cover you against social security fluctuations or to supplement your pension plan. In addition to that, you are currently servicing a $75,000 mortgage.

 

With assets above $1 million, you can hire the most competent financial advisory team as needed. Also, this amount of assets calls for competence in making the most appropriate decision. Keep it in mind that you are near the end of your professional engagement, which means that you are not in a position to recover from any financial mistakes.

 

Hiring a financial advisor can help you address issues like where and how to invest your assets, minimize your exposure to risk, determine when to apply for Social Security, identify your long-term healthcare needs. Your advisor won’t help you with everything you need as most have demanding engagements. You need a financial planner to successfully deal with diverse areas of estate planning and to reduce the impact of taxation on your assets. The importance of financial planning cannot be overstated as without this advice, your accumulated assets can be wiped out in an instant.

Even so, what are your available options?

 

Option #1: Hire a Money Manager

 

One approach is to hire a money manager also known as a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). An RIA is responsible for continuous management of your investment portfolio. Also, an RIA can provide expert investment advice in areas like hedge funds and real estate. Other RIAs can offer advanced financial planning services at no extra fees. Try talking to the investment section of your bank or independent RIA agents. On the other hand, you could opt to hire the services of a fee-only planner with fees levied based on the number of assets you hold. Most fee-only planners charge typical fees of 1% to 1.5% of your asset value.

 

Option # 2: Consult a Fee for Service Advisers

 

Consider consulting with a fee-for-service advisor who charges an hourly rate for an appointment. Go this route if you need to purchase long-term healthcare or medical insurance. Typically, their services are paid for using commissions or fees. Expect to pay $250 for an hour, $2,000 for a financial plan, or commission rates for insurance policies.

 

Option # 3: Retain the Services of a Premium Financial Firm

 

Another option would be to obtain financial advice from a premium financial advisory firm. Typically, you will have a dedicated financial advisor assigned to manage your portfolio. This ensures that you get the best possible financial guidance to help you with your investment, asset allocation, estate planning as well as annual reviews of your financial status. However, you need to observe due diligence regarding the firm you are contracting as well as comparisons between different providers. Most likely, your current investment fund manager will offer this service free. Other investment fund managers will provide you with a dedicated account exec if you have more than $500,000 assets in your portfolio. With assets of over $500,000, it is probable that you could qualify as a private client, which escalates the level and quality of advice you eventually receive.

 

Planning for retirement requires that you have a clear picture in mind what you want your sunset years to be like. For this reason, you must have a good picture in mind of what you want to accomplish during your retirement. Only in this way will you save adequately, act decisively, and ensure that your retirement is a success.

Michael Wood | Life Insurance: Myths and Facts

MICHAEL WOOD—Getting life insurance is one of the most important decisions you can ever make. Sometimes, a policy may seem expensive, or you may think your employer’s plan is enough. But you need to consider again.

 

As death is such a hard concept to understand or contemplate, most people don’t consider life insurance as vital in their lives. Typically, they have an aversion to matters associated with the demise of a loved one. Though majorities of us think that life insurance is important, usually we put off the buying decision. Consequently, we end up not prioritizing this requirement.

 

However, putting off nonpalatable topics helps to propagate myths. For this reason, this post highlights five of the most prevalent myths associated with life insurance as well as the truths.

 

Myth # 1: That an Employer’s Life Insurance Plan is Adequate

 

Fact: Typically, an employer provides insurance policies are one or two more times equal to your salary. Independently, you have the option of purchasing coverage that is six or seven times more than what your employer provides. However, salary deductions leave employees with a significantly less gross income. Also, there are limitations on the types of coverage you can retain if you choose to retire.

 

Keep it in mind that if you choose to retire, you might obtain extra coverage in which you contract as a client with an insurer independently of your employer. An advantage of this type of coverage is its portability when you switch employers. Estimates indicate that you will need between five to twelve times your present salary to cover your dependents’ needs. Also, converting an employer’s policy to an individual plan is more expensive down the road. This is especially true if you have any outstanding health conditions. Accordingly, you should consider any employer-provided insurance as a plus.

 

Myth #2: I am Not the Breadwinner, I Don’t Need Insurance

 

Fact: A common assumption is that insurance is for the proverbial breadwinner with the implication that once a breadwinner is gone, the family can continue enjoying sustenance. However, the loss of a breadwinner means that most families have to look for alternative sources of income. Having life insurance is important as it ensures continuity. Despite this widespread assumption, live at home spouses contribute to the well-being of the family. In a family where a low-income spouse has life insurance, main breadwinners have time to spend with their children as well as opportunities to assist during tragedies.

 

Myth #3: Life Insurance is Expensive

 

According to the Life Insurance and Market Research Association (LIMRA), 80% of individuals underestimate their life insurance needs. Why this trend? Because life insurance providers use factors such as your overall health, your age, social habits, medical, and family history to determine premiums. As a result, you get to pay lower premiums the younger and healthier you are.

 

Myth # 4: I Am Young, Why Worry About Life Insurance?

Fact: contrary to this assumption, getting life insurance when you are young makes a lot of sense. Why? Premiums are typically cheaper in your younger years. Conversely, old age and long-term medical conditions make it challenging to obtain vital life insurance. Logically, you should consider having life insurance if you have dependents to take care of in case of your demise.

 

Myth # 5: Term life Insurance is Sufficient for Me

 

Typically, term life covers individuals in the 75 to 80 age bracket. Moreover, term life premiums increase every ten years, so with time life insurance, you end up paying more. On the other hand, permanent life policies pay off in the event of your death as well as having fixed premiums no matter your age. Ideally, you should combine temporary and permanent life insurance policies. This is why you need to consult an advisor to identify the right life insurance product for your unique needs. For more information, talk to a financial professional like Michael Wood at Integrity Retirement Planning. A financial planner can help you make the right decision about your retirement and guide you to the right path.

Maximizing the Sweet Spot Years of Your Retirement

As you approach your retirement, it is high time you address your tax obligations. Retirement’s sweet spot is the period between formal retirement and when you begin accessing RMDs from your 401(k) plan or your individual retirement plan. Typically, this is around the age of 70.5 years.

Since you no longer have any full-time commitment, you are now in a lower tax bracket. Subsequently, this is the right time to benefit from low tax rates. Even so, you need to ensure that your overall retirement goals are in line with your retirement goals. Caveat! You shouldn’t focus on reducing the amount of taxes you pay instead, you should concentrate on accomplishing your retirement goals. So read on to find out more about how to leverage reduced tax rates.  Here are a few suggestions you can capitalize on low tax returns.

 

# 1: Embrace Roth

 

Convert your present IRA or 401(k) retirement plan into a Roth IRA. Though you must pay taxes on the conversion amount, it is at a much lower rate. On the other hand, retaining your funds in a traditional IRA or a 401(k) plan without taking out any RMDs leads to higher taxes.

 

Roth IRA withdrawals typically charge no taxes. Plus, no RMDs requirements apply to them. Actually, you can pass accumulated Roth IRA funds and tax-free status to your heirs.  Besides that, you can stretch a Roth IRA over several years to minimize the impact of taxes as well speed up switch over to a higher tax bracket anytime you want. But before initiating a conversion, you need to consider the following factors.

 

To begin with, ensure that you have sufficient cash resources for settling your due taxes. Beware that 2018 tax rules allow for no conversion reversals ever. This means that your assets are permanently locked in a Roth IRA. Besides, you must abstain from tapping into a Roth IRA’s assets for five years after conversion.

 

Offload Valuable Assets

 

You might have stock or assets held in a taxable account. If so, consider offloading your long-term high-value assets when your tax obligations are still minimal. Doing so lets you benefit from any appreciated gains.  Why is this so? Because any long-term gains on capital are adjusted relative to your gross income (see the table below).

 

Tax Rate Single Taxpayer Married Filing Jointly Head of Household
0% Below $38,600 Below $77,200 Below $51,700
15% $38,600-$425,800 $77,200-$479,00 $51,700-$452,400
20% Over $425,800 Over $479,000 Over $452,400

 

SSelling any appreciated assets when your income is below the 0% threshold attracts tax at a rate between 15% and 20%. Also, if you are married with gross revenues of $250,000, a 3.8% tax is imposed on any other income you earn.

 

Leverage Employee Stock Options

Take advantage of low tax rates with employee stock options in your retirement twilight years. Doing so when your stock’s value is high and pricesare low will increase your gains. Plus, use low tax years to offload most of your employee stocks.

 

Get Rid of Saving Bonds

Today, US saving bonds aren’t a viablemeansof long-termasset growth because of low-interest. This is why many retirees hold on to bonds issued during high-interestrate periods. Offloading these bonds means you only pay ordinary income tax on any accumulated interest. So selling off these assets is agreat financialcoup.

Military Service Members Overlooking Key Step While Enrolling In Blended Retirement System

It appears that more military service members are choosing the blended retirement system but overlooking an important step. That’s the word coming from the Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.

According to the Director of the FRTIB’s Participant’s Services Tee Ramos, approximately, 20,000 people have chosen the blended retirement system (BRS) the TSP offers, and they’ll get an automatic one percent contribution from their branch of service. However, the step they’re overlooking is how much of their pay they will contribute to the plan.

BRS participant contributions are not automatic unless designated by service members to be that way.

So, when uniformed service members don’t indicate how much contribution they’ll make each pay period, they are missing out on the full potential the TSP has to offer. With the blended retirement, members automatically get one percent from their armed service, but when they decide how much of their own money to put forth toward their paychecks, they can receive up to five percent.

The TSP is turning to social media – Facebook and Twitter – posting multiple reminders regarding the opt-in process. Federal employees already in the BRS can get more information about the program in the mail.

Newly enrolled uniformed service members have been automatically enrolled in the TSP since the start of 2018 when the board officially made the BRS public. However, any service member with 12 or fewer years in the military could opt-in if they wanted to.

According to the FRTIB, it’s the 12 years or fewer service members that are not taking advantage of all the benefits the TSP has to offer. For its part, the FRTIB has created an instructional video telling them about the process to opt-in for the BRS. They have until Dec. 31, 2018, to elect which retirement option to go with – either the current retirement system or the blended retirement system.

Over 50 percent of the uniformed service members are enrolled in the TSP in some form or fashion, with 162,000 service members in the BRS.

FRTIB Customer Service Sees Some Improvement

It appears that customer service is finally improving at TSP contact centers. In times’ past, there were very long wait times. In the first week of April, Thriftline customer service representations took about 14 seconds to answer phone calls. In mid-February, that number was 761 seconds with only 5.6 percent of calls being answered within 20 seconds.

Today, the agency’s goal is 20 seconds for all calls, and 87 percent of the calls are being answered in that timeframe.

While the agency still has some work to do, it is doing everything it can do to finalize the details and ensure they are back on the right path.

In January, more than 120,000 callers were on the phone waiting on a Thriftline representative for over five minutes. The TSP’s own customer service goal is to answer 90 percent of people’s calls inside of 20 seconds.

In mid-February, the agency saw hang-ups hovering around 35 percent; in April, the percentage dropped to just one percent.

More staff members were added to the roles, and a new training pilot was launched to help the new employees. TSP contact centers are not getting as many phone calls as they did in January, February, and March, as that’s the peak season for the TSP.

The FRTIB is also creating new queue messages that it will use when customers are facing long wait times. The message will talks about the wait times, information about the TSP website and information about frequently asked questions regarding various topics such as withdrawals requests and loans.

9 Things The RSC Budget Is Tackling To Get Control Over Federal Deficit

The Republican Study Committee recently unveiled its yearly budget proposal – A Framework for Unified Conservatism – for the 2019 fiscal year. The proposal mirrors many recent Trump Administration and other legislative proposals to diminish the pay and benefits of federal employees.

 

The budget proposal’s primary goal is to reduce spending by over $12 million over the course of 10 years. The federal workforce makes up just a minute amount of the suggested spending reductions, but the proposal does lay out the need to decrease spending in most areas of the federal government to halt the national debt from rising even further.

 

When it comes to increasing debt and controlling deficits, the only surefire way to handle them is to curb the spending. And, without some type of action now, an unstoppable debt spiral is inevitable, and a debt crisis will ensure. History has shown that countries that have gone bankrupt don’t last much longer.

 

The budget put forth by the Republican Study Committee is its ways to bring prosperity back to the American people. However, each day that goes by makes choices even more difficult and action must be taken.

 

What Does The Budget Proposal Target?

Here’s a look at some of the important points of the RSC’s budget proposal as it relates to the federal workforce.

 

Reductions In Pay and Benefits

 

The goal is to reduce the yearly across-the-board modification to federal civilian employees pay. According to the budget, the rapidly increasing federal government debt is in a state of financial emergency, which calls for the need to halt the automatic pay raises the Federal Employees Pay Comparability Act of 1990 allows for.

 

The RSC budget notes a president can restrict the increase’s size if warranted by an existing national emergency. As the proposal lays out, the rapidly growing national debt is an existing national emergency. Former PresidentBarack Obama put forth legislation that halted pay increases from 2011 to 2013. Still, the national debt rose to more than $21 trillion, and it’s expected to hit more than $34 trillion in the next 10years.

 

The RSC budget suggests federal workers get a half a percentage less than the anticipated amount in the yearly increase.

 

To justify their proposal, the RSC committee said most Americans do not see any kind of automatic pay increase and the Congressional Budget Office said federal employees are compensated17 percent more than private industry employees.

 

Reasonable Bonus Limits

 

Another proposal set forth by the RSC budget includes enacting reasonable bonus limits that federal workers are paid. Although the suggestion was made, there was no outline of what is or is not reasonable.

 

The support given in this area of the proposal was due to the Federal Employee Bonus Disclosure Act enacted by South Carolina. This act deems that the reporting of all federal worker bonuses be made public, and agencies would have to make reports for Congress to review.

 

Reforming Pension Plan

 

The budget proposal also looks to reform the pension plans of federal employees, which include the following five:

 

  • Pension calculation is determined on five highest years rather than the current three-year highest.
  • Employee contributions shares to FERS must increase over time, aligning with the private industry.
  • The cost of living adjustment for both CSRS and FERS needs to be done away with or decreased.
  • Get rid of the Special Retirement Supplement.
  • Decrease the G Fund’s interest rate for a better reflection of the temporary T-bill rate.

 

The budget also proposed that all – new and current – federal workers add more money to their retirement; not just new federal workers. According to the Middle-ClassTax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012, just newly employed federal workers were ordered to pay higher contributions, but the proposal wants to balance out the treatment to everybody in the federal workforce.


Reforming The Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHB)

 

According to the RSC budget, 30 percent of the premiums are paid by federal workers under the FEHB program while the other 70 percent is addressed by the government. Since the ratio isn’t changed throughout coverage ratios, federal workers often get the most expensive plan, but it’s the taxpayers paying for it.

 

A way to alleviate that problem is to modify the premium support system where the government offers a standard federal contribution toward health insurance and employees would pay the rest. According to the proposal, the option lets employees buy plans with the right amount of coverage that will fit their present needs.

 

The suggestion was made that the government decrease the amount it pays on premiums to align more with the private section but gave no percentage specifics other than the much less than 70 percent it currently pays out.

 

Make Firing Federal Employees Much Easier

 

The RSC proposal wants to include more legislation on a current one affecting the employees of the Department of Veterans Affairs. They want to include legislation that helps the VA secretary to suspend, demote or remove any VA employee not performing well in their job. This would cause federal employees to labeled “at-will employees” rather than the Congressional Staff they are right now.

 

This idea was initially brought to light by Indiana Republican Congressman Todd Rokita. The bill would let agency heads suspend or fire without any notice or right to appeal federal workers. The firing could be done for good reason, bad reason or no reason at all.

 

Use Recently Enacted Holman Rule

 

The budget proposal also suggests Congress use the modernized Holman Rule to get rid of any redundant executive branch positions. What does the budget actually say about the Holman Rule?

 

The rule lets amendments be added to House appropriations bills in an effort to decrease how much money the bill covers, limit the number of federal workers and decrease federal workers’ salary.

 

When used appropriately, the rule is a powerful ally for House of Representatives conservatives working with the Trump White House to restructure the federal government, allowing it to become more liable to the American people.

 

Federal agencies and the president must work together with the House to find redundant executive branch position and ensure House appropriations bills include the provisions of the Holman Rule to weed out positions that are not necessary to the running of the federal government.

 

Decrease The Federal Workforce Size

 

According to the budget, it is necessary to reduce the federal workforce size, limit new hires to one employee for every three that are fired, resigned or retired. The president is given the discretion to modify the federal employment when a national emergency arises.

 

Federal Unions and Union Due Collections

 

The RSC budget would also prohibit the power federal employee unions had and recommended that automatic union dues deductions be abolished. The budget states that the federal government is a dues collector for federal workers in a union when it the dues are taken out of the employee’s paycheck and then sent to the union. The RSC budget proposes that a federal worker who wants to be a part of the union should pay the union directly and not from the taxpayers.

 

Get Rid Of Official Time

 

Information from the RSC budget says that in 2012, taxpayers paid more than $157 million to federal workers for not doing their jobs. These workers, it found, were using official time to do other things. Getting rid of the official time would ensure the federal government workforce would be more efficient and effective.

The legislation also targets official time by reducing future annuity payments of federal employees that use most of that time working with the union.

 

White House Stands Behind 2019 Pay Freeze

The fiscal budget proposal for 2019 put out by the White House on February 10th had some unpleasant tidings for employees of the federal government. The Trump Administration’s suggestion of a pay freeze was one of the most worrisome. For those unfamiliar with the term, a pay freeze puts a stop to salary or wage increases for a specified period. The goal of a company, or in this case a government, implementing a freeze is to reduce costs and therefore increase profits or reduce a deficit and potentially pay off debt. Considering the United States’ typically has a massive budget deficit and is carrying massive long-term national debt it begs the question of how long the freeze will last. The problem for employees during a pay freeze is that while their pay remains stagnant, inflation does not. Combine that with the instability created by the indefinite time frame, and you have a recipe for a real headache.
The White House’s budget is of course just a proposal. The founding fathers gave Congress the “power of the purse,” meaning Congress has the final say over most budget decisions. It has been a few months since the proposal was released and concerned employees may have relaxed a little in that time. Now members of Trump’s staff are back in the news making statements in support of the pay freeze. Ironically, the reason for the budget proposal being back in the news—a May 7th open letter from Office of Personnel Management director Jeff Pon to House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.)—comes during “Public Service Recognition Week.” Since 1985 this week has been designed to honor employees who devote their careers and lives to public service.
Pon is not the only voice publicly backing the freeze recently. The director of the Office of Management and Budget, Mick Mulvaney, also wants to put a stop to minimum incremental pay increases that currently happen automatically throughout a federal employee’s career. The idea is to bring the public workforce closer to the private sector regarding the style of their compensation. “The proposal is rooted in data we had from analysis of the way we paid federal workers, and it seemed to indicate that we over-pay at the lower levels and underpay at the upper levels,” Mulvaney said in testimony before one of the House Appropriations subcommittees. The idea is that the incremental increases make it difficult to reward good employees and motivate poor performers under the current “General Schedule” pay scale, a policy enacted by the Classification Act of 1949.
A significant problem for federal employees with the proposed pay freeze is that while Trump mentioned a one billion dollar fund for 2018 to be used across all federal agencies to reward strong employees, no money was provided in the omnibus spending package enacted this past March.
Mulvaney’s testimony did receive opposition from some Democratic members of the House Appropriations Committee. Sanford Bishop (D-Ga.) said, “It seems to me that what you do when you put the freeze there and remove step increases, you remove incentives to get people to work for the federal government who are highly skilled, who have hopes of a good career that will be remunerative to them. It makes it less competitive with the private sector.”
This is the crux of the argument. Pon, Mulvaney, and the Republican government that generally supports them see the problem as being a lack of incentives for people to do a good job and improve performance in areas of need. The Democratic opposition considers the lack of guaranteed compensation as dissuading potential talent who can find more lucrative opportunities in the private sector. Another issue for current employees is that the uncertainty makes it difficult for them to plan for their futures and could have adverse effects on plans already made without anticipation of a pay freeze.

TSP’s I Fund To See A Much Brighter Future With FRTIB’s Change

In November 2017, the Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board option to expand its I Fund, which included the following: small-capitalization businesses, emerging markets, and Canada.

You can read the full plan by checking out their November meeting minutes. In a nutshell, the board decided that in 2019 the index the I Fund follows will change. The hope is that this will lead to better risk-adjusted returns for the future.

In June 2017, Aon Hewitt, a consulting firm, had spoken with the board, recommending they make the change. The Board agreed to look at what the implications would be in doing this and would address the matter sometime in the fall.

How Is The I Fund Going To Change?

Should the TSP follow through with this planned change, the I Fund will no longer watch the following indexes – Far East Index, Australasia and the Morgan Stanley Capital International Europe. Instead, the index it will follow is the Morgan Stanley Capital International All Country World Ex-US Investable Market Index.

What will this change allegedly do?

Simply put, it would increase the I Fund’s scope.

For instance, the Far East/Europe index the I Fund is currently following has more than 24 percent of the size financed in Japan, with 17 percent financed in Europe. This is a more than 40 percent investment in two leading countries. The seven countries, comprising of 80 percent of the I Fund index, are:

• Australia
• France
• Germany
• Japan
• Netherlands
• Switzerland
• UK

The I Funds’ All Country index is the one the fund will end up following, which only has between 12 percent and 17 percent invested in both the U.K. and Japan. The other countries make up 60 percent of the fund. By making this change, it would mean exposure would be given to South America and Asia and would nearly double the number of countries it will invest in.

Currently, the Far East/Europe index takes into consideration just mid-to-large-sized businesses, which makes up 85 percent of the respective market capitalizations. The All-Country index comprises any sized company (or 99 percent of the market capitalization).

Everything within the TSP funds, except the G Fund, is managed by BlackRock Inc. The company, along with its iShares ETFs charge about the same expense ratios for Far East/Europe and All Country ETFs, which means there shouldn’t be that big of a change happening to the I Fund expense ratio.

What Will The Value Of Emerging Markets Be?

Obvious changes occurring in the I Fund are the additions of small companies and Canada. However, the most notable difference is the inclusion of emerging markets such as Brazil, China, India, South Korea, Thailand, etc. Up to 25 percent of the All Country index is made up of emerging markets; they are not even considered in the Far East/Europe index.

While the “I fund” was regarded as the best TSP fund in 2017, with 25 percent yearly returns, it narrowly missed a 37 percent returns from the emerging markets in that same period. While the performance change is significant for each index every year, there are some indicators that the faster-growing markets will do well over the next ten years. Investors with no exposure are likely to be disappointed if they don’t invest in them.

The International Monetary Fund expects developed economies will see a two percent or less gross domestic product increase in the next five years. Japan, which is the most significant player of the Far East/Europe index, is anticipated to grow less than one percent a year because of two reasons – aging population and declining population. Emerging markets, however, are likely to develop five percent GDP every year.

PricewaterhouseCoopers believes the same thing is to occur. A look at their 2050 outlook notes that the top seven emerging markets were half the size of the top seven markets in 1995 and are currently the same size in 2015. They are thought to be two times the size in 2040. The reasons for this significant change include rising GDP per capita, larger population sizes, and quick population growth.

Along with all this, the Far East and Europe index have had a seven percent exposure in the technology industry, but the MSCIs Emerging Markets index has seen a whopping 27 percent exposure. Thus, the joint All Country index has had a 12 percent exposure to the technology sector.

Adding these economies to the “I fund” would ensure similar effects – the exposure of the technology industry would double.

With exposure like this, one would assume emerging markets would be valuable. In 2007, that happened. According to many metrics like the market-capitalization to GDP- ratios and price-to-earnings ratio, this market would be far more valuable than European or U.S. stocks.

While the yearly returns for the emerging markets haven’t done so well, their corporate earnings and economies have grown. Still, it appears investors see flat returns.

As it stands, emerging markets are still rather valuable even with higher growth expectations for the long-term. Of course, they don’t follow the same indices as other markets, and they trade at lower values than the markets in the U.S., gauging by price-to-book and price-to-earnings.

Developed international markets have similar low values but have extremely low growth in earnings.

The MSCI indices have comparable numbers, with emerging markets seeing low assessments and quicker anticipated growth than international and U.S. stock markets.

What Does It All Mean?

While investors should have international exposure, the kind of index they follow plays a massive role in how well or poor their investment is. Most of them don’t understand how intense the international funds are.

Look at the current set up of the I fund shows that it’s reasonably valued for the short-term, but, looking at the long-term view, it’s liable to miss out on worldwide growth. The heavy concentration of the I fund is focused in Europe and Japan, and adding the emerging markets, Canada, and small companies changes it very little but could have a tremendous impact in the long range.

With the FRTIB’s choice to use the All Country Market Index, the I Fund is going to see more exposure to geographic diversification and worldwide growth. Thus, TSP investors may end up with a much brighter future.

How To Get More Money From The Blended Retirement System

Free money—that’s the key advantage to using the Blended Retirement System (or BRS, for short) for people in the military and the federal government. Every time a person contributes to their Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) retirement account, the service matches it up to five percent of the pay.

What members don’t realize is that these are not automatic contributions when they opt into the BRS. Instead, they need to choose them. If a person skips this steps, they’re losing hundreds of dollars each year.

Service members are encouraged to contribute at least five percent of their pay to ensure they get the full match available to them through the Blended Retirement System. An E-2 will provide about $90 a month at five percent. If they opt into the BRS, the service sets up to TSP account and will immediately contribute one percent of the basic pay. The other four percent added depends on what the person does.

How To Sign Up For More Blended Retirement System Money?

It should not take more than five minutes to set up the contribution. You log into the payroll system to attain the earned benefit. You need to decide if you want a traditional contribution or a Roth one. Pick the contribution amount you feel comfortable with, but contribute the minimum five percent to get the full match of your military service – Air Force, Army, Marines, and Navy (be it active or reserve).

Be sure to use the myPay to send the contributions to your TSP account.

• When you log into the myPay program, go to Traditional TSP and Roth TSP.
• From there, you’ll see two columns – Contributions from Roth TSP and Contributions from Traditional TSP. Choose which one you want or both of them.
• Choose the percentage you want to save from your basic, incentive, bonus and special pay.
• Hit Save at the bottom of the screen. If you need additional help, be sure to call 1-888-332-7411.

Remember, the only way you’ll get the full matching amount from your service is to contribute at least five percent of the basic pay.

• Now go into Direct Access. You go to the Employee Page and click More under Tasks.
• Choose your Thrift Savings Plan, which lets you see how much you’re saving right now. If no contributions are being made to your TSP account, you need to begin with the Traditional TSP Base Pay.
• Another screen will appear, and you need to choose Edit, giving it percentages of the base pay you’d like to contribute. Be sure to use Before Tax if making traditional contributions and After-Tax if you’re making Roth contributions.
• Hit Save and Okay when a confirmation page pop-ups.

Congress Makes Some Changes To TSP With Modernization Act, Still Misses Opportunity To Improve It Further

What Does the TSP Modernization Act Mean?

A significant number of federal employees are using the Thrift Savings Plan as their key retirement savings account. After all, it comes with easy-to-comprehend market indexes with little fees. It allows them to match funds, make secure contributions and lower costs – all of which have helped millions of federal employees use the TSP to boost their nest egg.

The TSP, on the other hand, has not been great for retirees who want to use the money for retirement expenses or income. The complex distribution rules have countered the simplicity seen in accumulation. The regulations have created some confusion for federal employees.

Congress has attempted to deal with these issues by signing the TSP Modernization Act into law. This act will go into effect in November 2019 and has some intriguing improvements for TSP participants.

Unrestricted In-Service Withdrawals Starting AT 59 1/2

As it currently stands, federal employees can make a single in-service withdrawal from their TSP after they hit 59 1/2. The possibility gives impending retirees more options for retirement transition along with putting together meaningful distribution plans for the future rather than waiting for retirement.

The great news is that the option is even better. With the Modernization Act, TSP participants can do an infinite number of in-service withdrawals when they turn 59 1/2. This means they can successfully use their money to ready themselves for retirement, transferring it to a Roth IRA and carry out a post-separation plan.

Unrestricted Post-Separation Withdrawals

With the TSP Modernization Act, federal employees can withdraw their money from their accounts during retirement. Thus, they’ll be able to use their money without any restrictions. Some restrictions that were not taken care of include:

Restricted Number of Choices

The key funds of the TSP stay the same. The funds are low-cost, but the plan’s choices are not what is seen with others, not in the TSP. These choices don’t include market indexes that tie to key asset classes like commodities, emerging markets, long-term bonds and real estate. With five funds offered, the choices are easy but do restrict people from implementing a highly-diversified portfolio.

It’s a bit of a surprise Congress didn’t improve the TSP funds, especially since companies have determined how they can offer an array of options for a low fee.

RMD on Roth TSP

The TSP’s Roth part will still be subjected to the Required Minimum Distributions. For people to avoid this requirement to withdrawal when they turn 70 1/2 is to let the money go into a Roth IRA. Doesn’t seem right and counterproductive to force withdrawals from tax-free accounts.

TSP Annuity

This kind of annuity won’t change. The TSP annuity is considered an immediate annuity, which demands that complete surrender of the principal be made for assured income. This option isn’t that good for a retirement plan as they rarely evolve. TSP participants would be better off finding other annuities that offer some flexibility.

What Does It All Mean?

The TSP Modernization Act does have some positive changes to it. The distributions flexibility for impending retirees and retirees provides a plethora of chances to move away from the TSP into other retirement-appropriate accounts that don’t have so many restrictions tied to them.

However, Congress failed federal employees by not doing the following:

• Upgrading the TSP choices
• Getting rid of the Roth RMD
• Improving the TSP annuity

While the TSP has undoubtedly gotten some improvements, it’s not enough in some people’s eyes. However, something is better than nothing.

6 Important Facts about Retirement

When you are preparing for retirement, some things may come as a surprise. Retirement has changed significantly over the years, as American culture and economics have changed what retirement looks like for you as compared to your parents.

Fact #1: You are responsible for your own finances.

It used to be that you would work for 40 years with the same company, retire, get a gold watch for your service, and live the rest of your days on a pension. That’s gone now, or was converted to an IRA or 401(k).

Fact #2: You will live longer than your parents.

On average, a 65-year-old in the United States will live for 19 years, and even up to 25 or 30 years. On the bright side, this means that you have years and years to spend living your best life, pursuing new dreams, and reinventing yourself. Unfortunately, you still have to pay for it.

Fact #3: Retirement planning is not just about money.

            There are many aspects of living in retirement, and money is just one facet. If you have saved up all the retirement funds in the world, but do not do anything with them, you still can be lonely and bored. In retirement, money is a means to an end, rather than the end itself.

Fact #4: You have to make end-of-life decisions.

Talk to your loved ones about making preparations for the point you yourself cannot take care of yourself. Important things to remember are to set a health care proxy to make important financial decision, give someone power of attorney, and make sure your will is up-to-date.

Fact #5: You need to take care of yourself.

Retirement means that all the bad habits we had when we were younger catches up with us. However, there is still time to make good health decisions; start eating right, exercise, etc. Make sure that you maintain your health, and you will keep your body running relatively smoothly and painlessly.

Fact #6: Leave your regrets behind.

We all make mistakes throughout our life. When we reach retiremenet, an important part of enjoying your last years is just letting go of your past mistakes and regrets and looking forward to the future you have earned.

Rural America’s Postal Service is Slowly Crumbling

Recently, President Donald Trump announced that there would be drastic cuts in federal retirement benefits that would affect current and future employees attempting to retire. Among other changes, the retirement system would take a $143.5 billion cut in funding. In the U.S. Postal Service, this is slowly turning into a death knell for an already struggling enterprise.

In rural regions of the United States, there are such chronic understaffing issues that up to half of the positions in a post office in rural New York were vacant. This is not a unique problem, either; rural mail carriers across the nation are feeling the weight of intense cutbacks from the U.S. government. The number of career USPS employees decreased from around 750,000 to around 500,000 over the past 20 years.

Hiring has been a challenge, too; due to a law that requires the post office to pre-fund all retirement funds, being able to afford to hire a new employee can be a challenge. The low rate of pay (in 2010, the starting rate for part-time rural carriers was slashed from approximately $21/hour to just $15) as well as long hours —some employees report working 12-hour shifts, as well as being called in to fill in for other area post offices, even on days off.

This challenge escalates exponentially when it comes to rural post offices; the ‘retail apocalypse’ caused by megacorporations like Amazon.com has led to local malls and retail stores going out of business, meaning that online purchases increase dramatically. For rural employees, most of whom use their own vehicles to drive their routes, this has meant that they must overfill their vehicles with packages and carry them up long driveways, avoid angry animals, and travel through sometimes brutal weather conditions. On top of this, rural mail carriers are paid based on an ‘evaluated pay’ system- meaning that they are paid based on an estimate of how long their route should take, rather than how long it may actually take. When this is combined with the fact that the formula does not take into account the weight or size of the package, meaning that a sofa and a video game console would be calculated to take the same amount of time, it results in grossly underestimated pay for a strenuous, challenging job.

Trump threatens another government shutdown

Recently, U.S. President Donald Trump threatened yet another government shutdown if Congress did not provide more funding to build the Mexican border wall. “That wall has started,” said Trump as a campaign rally in Washington, Michigan. “We have 1.6 billion (dollars).” According to an article from Reuters, Trump signed a $1.3 trillion spending bill in May to keep the government funded through the end of September.  Notably, November mid-elections will make this decision an unpopular one to get supported by fellow Republicans, keen on maintaining control of the U.S. Congress.

Trump cited the ‘caravan’ of Central American migrants traveling towards the border as one of the reasons to reinforce United States Border Security. He described it as ‘sad’ and ‘terrible’, speaking about the crime that they ‘inflict on themselves and that others inflict on them.’ A total of around 400migrants are estimated to be seeking asylum from gang violence and corruption in their own countries.

This comes just on the heels of an unpopular move by Trump to freeze the pay of federal employees for 2019, which may just be the start of a broader revamp of the entire federal workforce system. This has raised questions as to the wisdom of Trump’s financial priorities, as federal institutions are already experiencing intense workforce shortages and increasing desperation to keep an aging workforce active and engaged.

Another increasing challenge that the federal workforce faces is increasingly negative public sentiment towards the government as a whole with ‘draining the swamp’ rhetoric making the federal workforce seem like a bad bet.

Altogether, it seems that the outlook may be grim for federal employees- especially if the Republican Party decides to take the action of a government shutdown. However, there is also the possibility that Trump is losing support and the wall may never happen, which could be an entirely different, potentially disastrous situation.

FERS for LEOs and Firefighters

The intricacies of LEO and firefighter retirements are considered to be unique as compared to the public sector in general; between early retirement, more generous annuities, and other small changes, it can be a challenge to understand quite what to expect or how to prepare.

Early Retirement Eligibility Requirements

As a FERS firefighter or LEO, you must retire from a covered position that will provide that benefit. The minimum age and service requirements are that you must either be age 50 and have at least twenty years of covered service, or you can be any age with 25 years of covered service. Military service does not apply unless you go directly from a firefighter or LEO position to the military and return to a covered position.

Mandatory Retirement

If you have completed twenty years of service in a position that allows early retirement, you are required to take the retirement option by the end of the month you turn 57. However, it is important to note that if you have fulfilled the requirement of years in a covered position, you can switch to a non-covered job and still receive the elevated annuity bonus while avoiding early retirement.

Annuity

Your annuity will end up being a more generous payout, but this is balanced out by higher contributions taken out of your income. To estimate your annuity, use the ‘high-3’ method- take the average of the highest-paid three years of your employment, take 1.7 percent of that salary, and multiply the result by 20. Then take one percent of your ‘high-3’ and multiply it by all remaining service over twenty years.

There is no penalty taken from your annuity if you retire early and can also receive cost-of-living adjustments annually instead of waiting until age 62.

Retirement can be challenging, but at the end of your retirement, it can often be a rewarding experience. Remember to speak with a financial professional about your retirement options before making any firm decisions, and you can be sure that your retirement will be safe and secure.

Framework for Unified Conservatism Creates Challenges for Federal Offices

A large number of government employees are up in arms about the Republican’s 2019 budget proposal. The GOP has termed the legislative proposal, A Framework for Unified Conservatism. After watching a House of Representatives led by Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI), a U.S. Senate led by majority leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), and Donald Trump’s White House push through a 1.5 trillion dollar tax cut, with well over half going to a reduction from 35% to 21% in the corporate tax rate, federal employees are watching their retirement benefits and health benefits come up on the chopping block. Their reaction was not surprising.
The American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) is the largest and most powerful union of federal employees. The organization’s National President J. David Cox Sr. issued a public statement in response to the proposals:

“President Trump’s war on working people knows no limits…Federal offices across the country are struggling to recruit and retain workers because federal wages and benefits are falling behind the private sector. While the proposals themselves are bad enough, so is the way the administration is trying to ram them through Congress…attached to the Department of Defense’s fiscal 2019 authorization bill.”
(The entire quote can be found online at http://chicagoeveningpost.com/2018/05/07/largest-federal-union-assails-trump-administrations-latest-attack-on-working-people/ or you can say afge.org)

The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) director Jeff Pon submitted an open letter to Speaker Ryan that proposed legislation that would align with the budget proposed by the White House for 2018. He argues the merit for the cuts is based on keeping with the retirement trends in the private sector. The proposal had four main facets: elimination of government supplementation of Federal Employees’ Retirement System (FERS) annuities “for new retirees and survivor annuitants,” lowering the pension calculation by including the five highest years instead of three highest years, an increase in the employee’s responsibility to fund their retirement benefit, and elimination of cost-of-living adjustments.
The OPM falling in step with the White House’s budget policies gives rise to the probability of the administration’s proposed pay freeze for civilian employees becoming a reality. On the other side of the aisle, Government Operations Subcommittee of the House Oversight Committee chair Gerry Connolly (D-VA) commented that “It’s the wrong thing to do and the wrong thing to do.” Back in December 2017 it was reported that Gerry Connolly was one of four Congressmen who sent a letter to House leaders urging them not cut federal employees pay and benefits. One of the largest concerns of the four Congressmen—also including Jamie Raskin (D-MD), Steny Hoyer (D-MD), and Elijah Cummings (D-MD)—is the ability of government agencies to retain and recruit talent moving forward.
In our era of extreme political polarization, this legislation is certainly no exception. Most Republicans are lining up with the President on the side of cutting into Federal Employees pay, and benefits in the name of lining up those benefits with the private sector and cutting into government spending while Democrats vocalizing their opinion are deeming the proposed cuts a betrayal of the promises made to middle-class federal employees. The two sides also do not agree on the OPM’s assertion that these cuts will, in fact, bring the retirement benefits of federal employees with working people in the private sector. Many of men and women employed by the federal government have spent the majority of their working life under the assumption that those benefits established for their retirement were not at risk of being adjusted and reduced based on a changing political landscape.
The 2018 mid-term election is just months away now. The focus of the media is largely on the Russia investigation, Michael Cohen, Stormy Daniels and the ever-flowing Twitter stream of the President. However, it is the economy and how people perceive the government is looking out for their interests that motivates how American’s vote. As the campaign season heats up expect to see more frequent mention of legislation like A Framework for a Unified Conservatism.

Not affiliated with The United States Office of Personnel Management or any government agency

©2021 Public Sector Retirement News. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Powered By :  FMM Financial Media & Marketing, LLC, The Best Financial Advisor Websites